By Zachary Baru
At the risk of sounding like an MBTA apologist, the $80 round trip commuter rail ticket from Boston to the World Cup this summer is not really the exorbitant price much of the internet has been blasting about.
While the internet does have its way of making too much about just about everything, if you really break this down, the $40 per direction cost of a train ticket that avoids Gillette Stadium traffic is not really that terrible. Especially considering the traffic expected during the World Cup.
Let's take for example, a regular New England Patriots game at Gillette Stadium. Let's say a game in September, versus the Jets. The traffic is certainly going to be backed up many miles down Route 1, in any direction, regardless of the day of the week, or the start time. If you've been to a Patriots game in Foxboro, you know this is a sure bet both before and after any game. Carpooling does not usually begin to make this any better, as the traffic is bad enough to annoy basically anyone in the car, whether they are driving or a passenger. Let's put it this way - if you are in the state of mind to remember the game, you are going to get annoyed with the traffic. A limo would make it a little better of course, a bus might help, but either way, you are stuck in thick traffic for miles in either direction. Bottom line, with the possible exception of the limo example, at this point many people might be thinking that an $80 commuter rail ticket to Downtown Boston might not be such a bad option.A ride to let's say, Springfield, which should be an hour and forty-five minutes, easily could be 3-4 hours. Especially with the threat of traffic on the Mass Pike. Not taking the Pike? Or not going to Western Mass.? You are betting on I-93 or I-95/Route 128 being traffic-free. There are a lot of reasons why rail can be a better travel option, and lets not even get into the environmental reasons, for which there are a lot.
When it comes to traveling through major cities and from major events, rail can be a very good option. MetLife Stadium has its own dedicated rail line during events, Denver has used light rail access since Empower Field opened, Madison Square Garden sees much more subway and rail access than cars, and Inter Miami's new stadium is connected to the terminus of Miami's commuter rail, creating record numbers for their Tri-Rail service. This isn't a new concept in the U.S. by far, especially with Madison Square Garden's track record since its opening in 1968. So why now, when Gillette Stadium's rail access is finally getting some attention, are people up in arms in what appears to be great numbers? An increase from $20 to $80 is of course a lot, but is the $60 really enough to get so upset about? Especially considering all of the above inconveniences that are all but removed with a rail ticket.
Perhaps it's the internet being the internet. Controversy sells, and clicks will always be clicks. But when all is taken into consideration, while a 300% increase will never be welcomed by customers in any industry, the real outcome here is a much improved experience for the fan. It will be a safer way of traveling, and more or less worry-free for any fan taking advantage of the commuter rail service Gillette Stadium has to offer. That sounds like an extra $60 well spent.
Zach Baru can be followed on Twitter @zbaru and reached at zachbaru@gmail.com.






